Skip to main content

Analysts sceptical iPhone X’s Face ID will be foolproof.

Apple is placing a bold bet that your face can securely unlock your phone, but experts are sceptical that it will be foolproof from the get-go. 
The iPhone X, out in November, will rely on facial recognition technology called Face ID. Apple, which is known for discarding technologies more aggressively than rivals, dumped its well-tested Touch ID fingerprint system that has been available in iPhones since 2013. 
While Face ID appears to be more sophisticated than the biometric systems used in competing devices like Samsung's Galaxy S8 phones, experts say the iPhone X will have to prove it won't be fooled by facial hair, makeup, glasses, masks, skin tones or poor lighting. 
Apple's bet goes beyond just unlocking phones. On Tuesday, Apple executive Phil Schiller said Face ID could also be used for purchases on an iPhone. 
There are enough unanswered questions to make Premkumar Natarajan, a biometrics industry expert and Apple stockholder, decide to wait until long after the iPhone X goes on sale in November. 
"How it's going to work out is not clear to me," said Natarajan, vice dean and professor of computer science at the USC Viterbi School of Engineering. "I was really looking forward to buying this, but now, I'm going to wait six to eight months to see what the reports are." 
Once a user's face is detected, a dot projector in the $999 iPhone X places 30,000 infrared dots on it, and an infrared camera takes a photo. Then, a computer system uses that information to create a mathematical model of the user's face. If that model matches one created when the user first set up the iPhone, the screen unlocks. If Face ID doesn't recognise the owner, the phone will ask for a pass code, which like Touch ID, will still be required when the phone restarts. 
Touch ID remains a part of the new iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus. But the iPhone X's larger screen required removing the physical home button, which doubled as the fingerprint reader for Touch ID. 
Apple claims Face ID has a 1 in a million chance of letting the wrong person into the phone, compared to Touch ID, which has a 1 in 50,000 chance. The company said if a user changes hairstyles, wears a hat or puts on glasses, the iPhone X will still recognise them. The company said it tested the technology on thousands of people, taking a billion images. Tests were done with Hollywood mask makers to ensure that the technology wouldn't falter, Schiller said. 
"The team has worked hard to protect your face data," Schiller said. Face data won't be uploaded to Apple's servers, staying on the phone instead. 
Still, hackers have managed to circumvent Samsung's Galaxy S8 iris scan lock feature by using a digital photo and a contact lens. Marc Rogers, head of information security for Internet security firm Cloudflare, said he doesn't think Face ID will be fooled by an ordinary photo. 
"However, the jury is out as to how secure it is," Rogers said in an email. "Knowing Apple, it will be good, but the big question is will it be good enough." 
And he said asking consumers to trust Face ID may take a while. "Touch ID was great because it required you doing something you normally do, touch the home button," he said. "Taking a selfie to pay for something doesn't feel natural to me. When people find things awkward, they don't use them. That's why before Touch ID, less than one in five people even had a PIN on their phone." 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lawsuit accuses Google of bias against women in pay, promotions

Three female former employees of Alphabet Inc's Google filed a lawsuit on Thursday accusing the tech company of discriminating against women in pay and promotions. The proposed class action lawsuit, filed in California state court in San Francisco, comes as Google faces an investigation by the U.S. Department of Labor into sex bias in pay practices. The lawsuit appears to be the first to make class action sex bias claims against Google, but is only the latest instance of a major tech company being accused of discriminating against women. The Department of Labor sued Oracle America Inc in January, claiming it paid white men more than women and minorities with similar jobs. Microsoft Corp and Twitter Inc are facing sex bias lawsuits, and Qualcomm Inc last year settled claims for $19.5 million. Meanwhile, Uber Technologies Inc in June said it would make a series of changes after a former engineer in a blog post accused the ride-hailing service of condoning ra

Hackers attacking US and European energy firms could sabotage power grids

A hacking campaign is targeting the energy sector in Europe and the US to potentially sabotage national power grids, a cybersecurity firm has warned. The group, dubbed “Dragonfly” by researchers at Symantec, has been in operation since at least 2011 but went dark in 2014 after it was first exposed, secretly placing backdoors in the industrial control systems of power plants across the US and Europe. Now, Symantec reports, the group has resumed operations, apparently working since late 2015 to investigate and penetrate energy facilities in at least three countries: the US, Turkey and Switzerland. “The Dragonfly group appears to be interested in both learning how energy facilities operate and also gaining access to operational systems themselves, to the extent that the group now potentially has the ability to sabotage or gain control of these systems should it decide to do so,” the cybersecurity firm warns. Dragonfly’s methods are varied, but all its attacks seem to be fo